Keyword summary
ā 99% 1 analyzed article/video 350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Press Corps results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 2,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ā 90% (3,924 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Press Corps is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. White House Press Corps
Keyword details
Total words: 1,050
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst