Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents' Dinner Shooting results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,381 hits. Analysis detected 11,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,995 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,902 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Correspondents' Dinner Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
White House Correspondents' Dinner Shooting

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate