Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Gedeon in Washington results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,545 of 6,185 authors). This Joseph Gedeon in Washington is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Joseph Gedeon in Washington
Author details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst