Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth Management results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,235 hits. Analysis detected 10,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,609 of 37,536 keywords). This Wealth Management is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Wealth Management
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Wealth Management (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
7.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 33.2%33.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 22.7%22.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 20.5%20.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 10.6%10.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 32.8%32.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos