Keyword summary
36% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Rights results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 4,895 hits . Analysis detected 40,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,889 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,178 of 37,536 keywords). This Water Rights is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Water Rights
Keyword details
Total words: 57,889
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles57.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst