Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hend Salama Abo Helow results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,548 hits . Analysis detected 5,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,350 authors). This Hend Salama Abo Helow is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hend Salama Abo Helow
Author details
Total words: 6,237
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 24.8% 24.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst