Keyword summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Post Editorials results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Ad Hominem , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 427 hits . Analysis detected 2,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (11,464 of 59,653 keywords). This Washington Post Editorials is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Washington Post Editorials
Keyword details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst