Keyword summary
31% 3 analyzed articles/videos 686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Commanders results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Ad Hominem , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 2,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,318 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,770 of 37,530 keywords). This Washington Commanders is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Washington Commanders
Keyword details
Total words: 3,318
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst