Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Warren Petersen results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,591 hits . Analysis detected 8,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,203 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,589 keywords). This Warren Petersen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Warren Petersen
Keyword details
Total words: 7,203
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst