Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War In Ukraine results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,573 hits . Analysis detected 12,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,675 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,180 of 35,596 keywords). This War In Ukraine is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. War In Ukraine
Keyword details
Total words: 14,675
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst