Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lizzie Johnson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 1,275 hits . Analysis detected 4,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,745 of 6,365 authors). This Lizzie Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Lizzie Johnson
Author details
Total words: 3,809
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 33.5% 33.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 33.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.6% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst