Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walt Frazier results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,920 hits . Analysis detected 11,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,075 of 34,637 keywords). This Walt Frazier is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group. Walt Frazier
Keyword details
Total words: 7,264
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.4% 26.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst