Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walt Frazier results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,920 hits. Analysis detected 11,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,075 of 34,637 keywords). This Walt Frazier is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Walt Frazier
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
68%Walt Frazier (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,264
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.4%26.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos