Keyword summary
64% 6 analyzed articles/videos 641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting Systems results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,119 hits . Analysis detected 10,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,916 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (29,732 of 35,810 keywords). This Voting Systems is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Voting Systems
Keyword details
Total words: 11,916
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst