Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Redistricting results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,626 hits . Analysis detected 13,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,344 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,675 of 34,834 keywords). This Virginia Redistricting is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Virginia Redistricting
Keyword details
Total words: 15,344
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst