Keyword summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venus results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,675 hits . Analysis detected 5,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,996 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,116 of 37,536 keywords). This Venus is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Venus
Keyword details
Total words: 9,996
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst