Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valley Forge results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 585 hits. Analysis detected 3,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,973 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,416 of 37,369 keywords). This Valley Forge is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Valley Forge
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
35%Valley Forge (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,973
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos