Keyword summary
59%1 analyzed article/video931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valkyries results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,225 of 37,536 keywords). This Valkyries is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Valkyries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%Valkyries (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos