Keyword summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uvm Health results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,391 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,933 of 37,536 keywords). This Uvm Health is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Uvm Health
Keyword details
Total words: 4,391
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst