Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Trade Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Pessimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,103 hits . Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,163 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Trade Policy is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Us Trade Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 7,304
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst