Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniele Nyirandutiye results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 572 hits . Analysis detected 2,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,638 of 6,628 authors). This Daniele Nyirandutiye is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Daniele Nyirandutiye
Author details
Total words: 2,312
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 24.7% 24.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 24.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst