Keyword summary
74%3 analyzed articles/videos350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Service Members results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 3,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,588 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,177 of 35,444 keywords). This US Service Members is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
US Service Members
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
58%US Service Members (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,588
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate