Raw Story⁠93%

'May the gates of hell open': MAGA lawmaker cheers Iran war escalation as bodies pile up ⁠72%

By Alexander Willis⁠88%

7/19/2026, 12:51:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 921 faulty-reasoning hits from 350 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (5,897 of 20,377 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Randy Fine (R-FL) championed the United States’ most recent wave of strikes on Iran Saturday, urging the Trump administration to escalate the war further and unleash “the gates of hell” on the Middle East nation. 
“I am heartbroken and overwhelmed with gratitude to the soldiers and their families who sacrificed to protect America from the threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon,” Fine wrote Saturday in a social media post on X. 
“We must avenge them. 
May the gates of hell open to the evil in Iran. 
Bombs away.” 
U.S. 
Central Command revealed Saturday evening that the United States had launched a new wave of strikes on Iran in retaliation for Iranian strikes on the U.S. 
Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, strikes that killed at least two U.S. service members. 
Fine has long championed U.S. aggression toward Iran and is among the most pro-Israel lawmakers in Congress, having embraced his moniker “The Hebrew Hammer.” 
He’s received scrutiny for his rhetoric, with critics labeling it as “ racist ” and “ genocidal ,” particularly when directed at Palestinians. 
For instance, last year Fine said Gazans should ‘ starve away ’ until all Israeli hostages were returned, a remark made in response to reports about rising famine deaths of Gazans amid Israel’s aid blockade . 
In 2021, in response to a social media user who shared a photo of what appeared to be a Gazan infant buried in rubble with the question “how do you sleep at night,” Fine responded “ quite well, actually ,” and “thanks for the pic!” 
Amid the Iran war escalations, Trump was reportedly spotted at his golf club in New Jersey, sparking a chorus of criticism from critics. 
I am heartbroken and overwhelmed with gratitude to the soldiers and their families who sacrificed to protect America from the threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon. 
We must avenge them. 
May the gates of hell open to the evil in Iran. 
Bombs away. https://t.co/suStI4Gd4q 
— Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) July 19, 2026 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 6.7%Rawstory: 7.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Alexander Willis: 7.1%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 6.9%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.6%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Alexander Willis: 18.7%Rawstory: 13.7%Framing Effect14.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.4%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 0.6%Alexander Willis: 3.1%Rawstory: 2.8%Pessimism Bias0.6%This article: 52.3%Alexander Willis: 27.6%Rawstory: 22.0%Negativity Bias52.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.2%Rawstory: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.6%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.6%This article: 10.0%Alexander Willis: 2.2%Rawstory: 2.6%In-Group Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.5%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Alexander Willis: 2.8%Rawstory: 1.7%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Alexander Willis: 3.8%Rawstory: 6.4%Ad Hominem6.6%This article: 10.3%Alexander Willis: 1.0%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man10.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 4.1%Rawstory: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.5%Rawstory: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.1%Rawstory: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Alexander Willis: 8.0%Rawstory: 12.0%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.8%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.2%Rawstory: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 55.1%Alexander Willis: 11.2%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion55.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.3%Rawstory: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.0%Alexander Willis: 2.5%Rawstory: 3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.3%Rawstory: 1.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 23.1%Alexander Willis: 6.3%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal23.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Alexander Willis: 3.0%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.3%Alexander Willis: 7.5%Rawstory: 5.5%Unattributed Quote10.3%This article: 4.6%Alexander Willis: 5.8%Rawstory: 4.2%Quote-first Misdirection4.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 13.4%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.0%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 7.3%Rawstory: 8.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.8%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

350 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers60%attributed speech139writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 36 words • 100.0% coverageRandy Fine • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Central Command • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRandy Fine • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCongressman Randy Fine • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Randy Fine

100%flagged-word coverage
177 attributed words84% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+20.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Randy Fine: 20.3%20.3%Quote-first Misdirection-11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Randy Fine: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.