Keyword summary
95%2 analyzed articles/videos639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randy Fine results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 4,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,206 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,104 of 34,833 keywords). This Randy Fine is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Randy Fine
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
83%Randy Fine (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,206
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 32.3%32.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.9%20.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos