Keyword summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randy Fine results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 713 hits . Analysis detected 4,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,206 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,104 of 34,833 keywords). This Randy Fine is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Randy Fine
Keyword details
Total words: 2,206
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.5% percentile 5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 32.3% 32.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst