Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-Israel War results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 1,678 hits . Analysis detected 11,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,136 of 37,536 keywords). This Us-Israel War is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Us-Israel War
Keyword details
Total words: 5,940
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.3% 28.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst