Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Israel Relations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 817 hits . Analysis detected 7,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,688 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,493 of 34,053 keywords). This US Israel Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. US Israel Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 5,688
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% No True Scotsman: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst