Keyword summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Imperialism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,189 hits . Analysis detected 17,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,583 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Imperialism is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Us Imperialism
Keyword details
Total words: 15,956
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst