Keyword summary
64% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of California results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,665 hits . Analysis detected 11,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,447 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,554 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of California is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. University Of California
Keyword details
Total words: 15,447
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst