Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Universe results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 4,079 hits . Analysis detected 11,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Universe is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Universe
Keyword details
Total words: 12,768
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 31.9% 31.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 31.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst