Keyword summary
19% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Creatures Of The Sea results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 4,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,835 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,402 of 35,766 keywords). This United Creatures Of The Sea is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. United Creatures Of The Sea
Keyword details
Total words: 5,835
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst