Keyword summary
39%2 analyzed articles/videos6,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Undersea Cables results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 2,060 hits. Analysis detected 16,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,268 of 36,156 keywords). This Undersea Cables is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Undersea Cables
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Undersea Cables (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles24.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate