Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ulf Kristersson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 470 hits . Analysis detected 3,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,396 of 37,536 keywords). This Ulf Kristersson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Ulf Kristersson
Keyword details
Total words: 4,060
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst