Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ucag Zl Ii Cave results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 163 hits . Analysis detected 1,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,788 of 37,536 keywords). This Ucag Zl Ii Cave is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Ucag Zl Ii Cave
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst