Keyword summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uber Eats results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 405 hits . Analysis detected 2,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,013 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,989 of 37,536 keywords). This Uber Eats is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Uber Eats
Keyword details
Total words: 2,013
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst