Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Sanctions results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,959 hits . Analysis detected 10,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,610 of 34,420 keywords). This U S Sanctions is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. U S Sanctions
Keyword details
Total words: 9,448
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.7% 20.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst