Keyword summary
96%1 analyzed article/video1,337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Intervention results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.3% saturation with 2,154 hits. Analysis detected 8,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 82% (9,354 of 49,535 keywords). This U S Intervention is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
U S Intervention
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
82%U S Intervention (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 40.3%40.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos