Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos5,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Department Of Agriculture Usda results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,539 hits. Analysis detected 13,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,556 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,247 of 34,053 keywords). This U S Department Of Agriculture Usda is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
U S Department Of Agriculture Usda
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Bastille Day1%
0%Radio Broadcasts1%
0%Metropolitan Opera1%
0%Borders1%
0%French Revolution1%
6%U S Department Of Agriculture Usda (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,556
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate