Keyword summary
71%3 analyzed articles/videos1,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Central Command Centcom results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 1,396 hits. Analysis detected 6,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,482 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,891 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Central Command Centcom is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
U S Central Command Centcom
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,482
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate