Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trumprx results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,132 hits. Analysis detected 4,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,297 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,011 of 37,536 keywords). This Trumprx is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Trumprx
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
36%Trumprx (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,297
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos