Keyword summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribal Nations results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Red Herring , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,194 hits . Analysis detected 6,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,064 of 37,536 keywords). This Tribal Nations is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Tribal Nations
Keyword details
Total words: 6,444
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Red Herring: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst