Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Travis Scott results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Travis Scott is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Travis Scott
Keyword details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst