Keyword summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos1,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trash results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 7,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,501 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (27,430 of 37,536 keywords). This Trash is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Trash
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠27%Trash (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos