Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ava Pukatch results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,110 hits . Analysis detected 8,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,296 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,497 of 6,296 authors). This Ava Pukatch is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Ava Pukatch
Author details
Total words: 6,296
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.6% 17.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst