Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transnational Threats results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 895 hits. Analysis detected 4,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,627 of 35,690 keywords). This Transnational Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Transnational Threats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
51%Transnational Threats (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos