Keyword summary
⁠65%6 analyzed articles/videos5,586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Policy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 3,520 hits. Analysis detected 21,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,071 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (27,163 of 37,536 keywords). This Trade Policy is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Trade Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠28%Trade Policy (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos