Keyword summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Gloria results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 556 hits . Analysis detected 2,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,413 of 37,536 keywords). This Todd Gloria is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Todd Gloria
Keyword details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst