Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Time Change results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 4,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,479 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,823 keywords). This Time Change is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Time Change
Keyword details
Total words: 6,479
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst