Keyword summary
15%3 analyzed articles/videos2,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Walrus And The Carpenter results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 6,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,757 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,546 of 37,536 keywords). This The Walrus And The Carpenter is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
The Walrus And The Carpenter
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate