Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Midnight Diners results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 2,754 hits . Analysis detected 10,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,970 of 37,536 keywords). This The Midnight Diners is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. The Midnight Diners
Keyword details
Total words: 8,668
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.8% 31.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst