Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thames Valley Police results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 2,496 hits . Analysis detected 8,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,881 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,977 of 37,536 keywords). This Thames Valley Police is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Thames Valley Police
Keyword details
Total words: 6,881
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.3% 36.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst