Keyword summary
7% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Hill Country results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 4,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,022 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,782 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Hill Country is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Texas Hill Country
Keyword details
Total words: 9,022
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst